Assessing the Case for Striking Syria
Testimony from National Security and Defense Program
Testimony from National Security and Defense Program

Assessing the Case for Striking Syria

September 2013

Testimony
Testimony by CFR fellows and experts before Congress.

More on:

Syria

Homeland Security

In his testimony before the House Committee on Homeland Security, Stephen Biddle acknowledges that neither the case for nor against using force in Syria is without serious costs and risks. He evaluates the five main goals an attack might be designed to achieve: deterring further CW use and upholding norms against the employment of such weapons; preserving U.S. credibility; enabling a negotiated settlement to the war; toppling Assad and his government; and ending the humanitarian crisis by saving civilian lives.

More on:

Syria

Homeland Security

Top Stories on CFR

China

Despite ongoing and high-profile corruption issues, China’s military continues to rapidly modernize.

Elections and Voting

Globally, more people than ever before voted in national elections in 2024. How did democracy fare?

Syria